Discussion:
No, you're not imagining it - package sizes are shrinking
(too old to reply)
Joe Biden Carter
2022-06-13 06:48:34 UTC
Permalink
...I spent all night taking it up the ass.
It’s the inflation you’re not supposed to see.

From toilet paper to yogurt and coffee to corn chips,
manufacturers are quietly shrinking package sizes without
lowering prices. It’s dubbed “shrinkflation,” and it’s
accelerating worldwide.

In the U.S., a small box of Kleenex now has 60 tissues; a few
months ago, it had 65. Chobani Flips yogurts have shrunk from
5.3 ounces to 4.5 ounces. In the U.K., Nestle slimmed down its
Nescafe Azera Americano coffee tins from 100 grams to 90 grams.
In India, a bar of Vim dish soap has shrunk from 155 grams to
135 grams.

Shrinkflation isn’t new. But it proliferates in times of high
inflation as companies grapple with rising costs for
ingredients, packaging, labor and transportation. Global
consumer price inflation was up an estimated 7% in May, a pace
that will likely continue through September, according to S&P
Global.

“It comes in waves. We happen to be in a tidal wave at the
moment because of inflation,” said Edgar Dworsky, a consumer
advocate and former assistant attorney general in Massachusetts
who has documented shrinkflation on his Consumer World website
for decades.

Dworsky began noticing smaller boxes in the cereal aisle last
fall, and shrinkflation has ballooned from there. He can cite
dozens of examples, from Cottonelle Ultra Clean Care toilet
paper, which has shrunk from 340 sheets per roll to 312, to
Folgers coffee, which downsized its 51-ounce container to 43.5
ounces but still says it will make up to 400 cups. (Folgers says
it’s using a new technology that results in lighter-weight
beans.)

Dworsky said shrinkflation appeals to manufacturers because they
know customers will notice price increases but won’t keep track
of net weights or small details, like the number of sheets on a
roll of toilet paper. Companies can also employ tricks to draw
attention away from downsizing, like marking smaller packages
with bright new labels that draw shoppers’ eyes.

That’s what Fritos did. Bags of Fritos Scoops marked “Party
Size” used to be 18 ounces; some are still on sale at a grocery
chain in Texas. But almost every other big chain is now
advertising “Party Size” Fritos Scoops that are 15.5 ounces —
and more expensive.

PepsiCo didn’t respond when asked about Fritos. But it did
acknowledge the shrinking of Gatorade bottles. The company
recently began phasing out 32-ounce bottles in favor of 28-ounce
ones, which are tapered in the middle to make it easier to hold
them. The changeover has been in the works for years and isn’t
related to the current economic climate, PepsiCo said. But it
didn’t respond when asked why the 28-ounce version is more
expensive.

Likewise, Kimberly-Clark — which makes both Cottonelle and
Kleenex — didn’t respond to requests for comment on the reduced
package sizes. Procter & Gamble Co. didn’t respond when asked
about Pantene Pro-V Curl Perfection conditioner, which downsized
from 12 fluid ounces to 10.4 fluid ounces but still costs $3.99.

Earth’s Best Organic Sunny Day Snack Bars went from eight bars
per box to seven, but the price listed at multiple stores
remains $3.69. Hain Celestial Group, the brand’s owner, didn’t
respond to an email seeking comment.

Some companies are straightforward about the changes. In Japan,
snack maker Calbee Inc. announced 10% weight reductions — and
10% price increases — for many of its products in May, including
veggie chips and crispy edamame. The company blamed a sharp rise
in the cost of raw materials.

Domino’s Pizza announced in January it was shrinking the size of
its 10-piece chicken wings to eight pieces for the same $7.99
carryout price. Domino’s cited the rising cost of chicken.

In India, “down-switching” — another term for shrinkflation — is
mostly done in rural areas, where people are poorer and more
price sensitive, said Byas Anand, head of corporate
communications for Dabur India, a consumer care and food
business. In cities, companies simply jack up prices.

“My company has been doing it openly for ages,” Anand said.

Some customers who have noticed the downsizing are sharing
examples on social media. Others say shrinkflation is causing
them to change their shopping habits.

Alex Aspacher does a lot of the grocery shopping and meal
planning for his family of four in Haskins, Ohio. He noticed
when the one-pound package of sliced Swiss cheese he used to buy
shrank to 12 ounces but kept its $9.99 price tag. Now, he hunts
for deals or buys a block of cheese and slices it himself.

Aspacher said he knew prices would rise when he started reading
about higher wages for grocery workers. But the speed of the
change — and the shrinking packages — have surprised him.

“I was prepared for it to a degree, but there hasn’t been a
limit to it so far,” Aspacher said. “I hope we find that ceiling
pretty soon.”

Sometimes the trend can reverse. As inflation eases, competition
might force manufacturers to lower their prices or reintroduce
larger packages. But Dworsky says once a product has gotten
smaller, it often stays that way.

“Upsizing is kind of rare,” he said.

Hitendra Chaturvedi, a professor of supply chain management at
Arizona State University’s W.P. Carey School of Business, said
he has no doubt many companies are struggling with labor
shortages and higher raw material costs.

But in some cases, companies’ profits — or sales minus the cost
of doing business — are also increasing exponentially, and
Chaturvedi finds that troubling.

He points to Mondelez International, which took some heat this
spring for shrinking the size of its Cadbury Dairy Milk bar in
the U.K. without lowering the price. The company’s operating
income climbed 21% in 2021, but fell 15% in the first quarter as
cost pressures grew. By comparison, PepsiCo’s operating profit
climbed 11% in 2021 and 128% in the first quarter.

“I’m not saying they’re profiteering, but it smells like it,”
Chaturvedi said. “Are we using supply constraints as a weapon to
make more money?”

https://apnews.com/article/india-prices-business-
d2c8279d39e1304f5623b3a99b56b8cc
Chicago Poisoners, The Mars Family
2022-07-16 11:30:59 UTC
Permalink
...87% of their 2022 political donations when to Democrat pieces of shit.
Taste the toxin?

A lawsuit filed Thursday in northern California federal court
alleges that Skittles candies, which boast the slogan “taste the
rainbow” on account of their many colors, contain a “known
toxin” called titanium dioxide, rendering them “unfit for human
consumption”.

Jenile Thames, a resident of San Leandro, filed suit against
Mars Inc, the confection company that produces Skittles, seeking
class-action status and alleging that people who consume
Skittles “are at heightened risk of a host of health effects for
which they were unaware stemming from genotoxicity – the ability
of a chemical substance to change DNA”.

The civil suit contends that Mars has long known about alleged
risks associated with this chemical and, in February 2016,
publicly vowed that it would phase out titanium dioxide. After
France banned titanium dioxide in 2019, Mars said that it would
comply with this regulation, court papers state.

Thames’s lawsuit alleges that Mars “blew smoke” with that
promise six years ago, by intimating that the phase-out was just
because “consumers today are calling on food manufacturers to
use more natural ingredients in their products”.

“Incredibly, Defendant even claimed that ‘[a]rtificial colors
pose no known risks to human health or safety’,” Thames’ suit
also said. “In doing so, Defendant concealed from consumers
material information it knew.”

Thames contends that Mars still sells candy in the US that
contains titanium dioxide as an additive and is “failing to
inform consumers of the implications of consuming the toxin”.
(Ingredients lists vary, some saying they might or might not
contain titanium dioxide.)

“Instead, Defendant relies on the ingredient list which is
provided in minuscule print on the back of the Products, the
reading of which is made even more challenging by the lack of
contrast in color between the font and packaging, as set out
below in a manner in which consumers would normally view the
product in the store,” court papers contend.

Thames argued that Mars does not appropriately apprise Skittles
consumers of this alleged unsafe additive, either before or at
the time of purchase – nor did the company tell them that these
candies “should otherwise be approached with caution”.

According to the European Food Safety Authority, titanium
dioxide is “a pigment commonly used to provide a cloudy effect
and white background colour”, and is typically used in candy and
baking. In 2021, the authority announced that “titanium dioxide
can no longer be considered safe as a food additive”.

“A critical element in reaching this conclusion is that we could
not exclude genotoxicity concerns after consumption of titanium
dioxide particles,” the authority said. “After oral ingestion,
the absorption of titanium dioxide particles is low, however
they can accumulate in the body.”

A Mars spokesperson said in an email that the company does not
comment on pending litigation.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/jul/15/skittles-mars-
lawsuit-titanium-dioxide-toxin

Loading...